Menu

logo Distinción Buena Práctica en Participación Ciudadana

imatge de fons

Distinction

For the 19th edition of the OIDP Award "Best Practice in Citizen Participation," we received 137 local democracy practices from local and regional governments across 37 countries:

Albania, Argentina, Benin, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Brazil, Cameroon, Chad, Chile, Colombia, Ivory Coast, Croatia, Ecuador, El Salvador, Slovakia, Spain, United States, Philippines, France, Guatemala, Iran, Italy, Kenya, Lebanon, Mali, Morocco, Mexico, Mozambique, Nepal, Pakistan, Portugal, Senegal, Taiwan, Palestinian Territories, Togo, Turkey, Uruguay, Uzbekistan.

19th IOPD Award Best Practice in Citizen Participation

Municipality of San Luis Potosí (Mexico)
for the practice
“Building Citizenship”

Read more

Special Mentions

  • Special Mention for Urban Management and Public Space Turin (Italy)
    “Voci di quartiere: Civic engagement for the new Master Plan of Turin”

    Read more

  • Special Mention for Gender and Care Mersin (Türkiye):
    “Monday Talks”

    Read more

  • Special Mention for Ecological Transition and Environment Azuay (Ecuador):
    “Ecological and Participatory Restoration of Wetlands in the Province of Azuay”

    Read more

  • Special Mention for Civic Tech Medellín (Colombia):
    “Citizen Participation Index and Virtual Voting”

    Read more

  • Special Mention for the Most Supported Practice by the OIDP Community Tilottama (Nepal):
    “Green Clean Tilottama Campaign”

    Read more

  • Special mention for Durability, in collaboration with the Phoenix Project:
    Niterói (Brazil):
    “Digital Democracy and Social Participation in the Municipality of Niterói”

    Read more

Jury

For this 19th edition of the OIDP Award, the evaluation process involved two groups of jurors: one for the initial phase of assessing all submissions and selecting the finalists, and another for the final deliberation to choose the winning practice and special mentions from among the 40 finalists.

The first jury comprised 17 individuals, divided into groups according to the award categories. Between February and March 2025, this jury carefully reviewed and evaluated all eligible applications. Their work concluded with the selection of the 40 finalists that advanced to the second phase of the process.

The second jury comprised a smaller group of expert members from the OIDP network. This jury was responsible for the final deliberation phase, during which they evaluated the 40 shortlisted practices in detail. Their task was to identify the winning practice of the 19th edition of the OIDP Award, as well as to grant Special Mentions to outstanding initiatives across the five thematic categories.

This final evaluation meeting took place in April 2025 and involved rich discussions to assess each finalist's innovation, impact, inclusiveness, and transformative potential. The jury’s decision reflects a collective commitment to advancing participatory democracy and recognizing practices that create meaningful opportunities for civic engagement in public life.

  • Lucia Aboutaoufik
  • Serge Allou
  • Emiliano Arena
  • Matthew Bach
  • Andrés Barrios Arenas
  • Pamela Cáceres
  • Silvia Cervellini
  • Diana Dajer
  • Aurelio Escobar
  • Brigitte Fargevieille
  • Lhoucin Ferdous
  • Sheila Holz
  • Johan Lilja
  • Carlos Mascarell Vilar
  • Analía Nievas
  • Claire Ollier
  • Chandrima Padmanabhan
  • Savaş Zafer Şahin
  • Paolo Spada
  • Lola Vico
  • Juan Domingo Viola
  • Ana Gabriel Zúñiga